Staphylinidae LiteratureLiterature index
Menu

The first species of Homaeotarsus Hochhuth, 1851 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae) with remarkable sexual dimorphism

Letícia Cavalcanti, Bruno Gouvea, Roberta M. Valente, Angélico Asenjo

Citation details

Year
2026
Journal
Zootaxa
Volume
5839
Issue
1
Pages / article
155–166
Publication date
Full text
Access via publisher Subscription or purchase may be required.
Supplementary materials
Not listed by publisher.

Citation tools

BibTeXRIS

Scientific scope

Subfamily
Paederinae

Taxonomic coverage: Subfamily — Complete; Tribe — Unknown; Genus — Complete; Species — Focal taxa only

Country: Brazil

Reported localities: Urucu petroleum province, Amazonas, Brazil, Brazilian Amazon

Work type: taxonomy, new species, sexual dimorphism, canopy fogging, identification key

Keywords: Coleoptera, canopy fogging, Amazon, identification key, petroleum province, Urucu

Connections are based on shared indexed taxa or authors.

  1. Same subfamilyPaederinae

    On the genus Tetartopeus Czwalina, 1888 of Türkiye III. A new species from Northern Anatolia, and some new records of the genus from the Palaearctic region (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae)

    Sinan AnlaşZootaxa

  2. Same subfamilyPaederinae

    Scopaeus punctatellus Fauvel, 1905 (Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Lathrobiini: Scopaeina), a polytypic species in the Afrotropical, Madagascan, and Saharo-Arabian regions

    Johannes FrischSoil Organisms

  3. Same subfamilyPaederinae

    Estafilínidos de Tlaxcala, México (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

    Juan Márquez, Julieta AsiainDugesiana

Verification and provenance

Bibliographic identity verified from official sources

Scientific metadata: Contains unknown fields · Status definitions

Confirmed and represented

  • The bibliographic identity, DOI, publication date, subfamily Paederinae, genus Homaeotarsus, the focal new species Homaeotarsus forceps and the reported Brazilian geography are confirmed.
  • The DOI resolves to the official publisher article page.

Limits and unresolved fields

  • Tribal placement is not established, so no tribe is assigned.
  • Species-level coverage is focal: the publication also provides a key to three Brazilian species, which are not all encoded in the current record.

Sources checked